## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atrasentan (Xinlay), a selective endothelin‐A receptor antagonist, in patients with metastatic hormone‐refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). ## METHODS. This multinational, double‐blind, placebo‐contro
Randomized phase II study of atrasentan alone or in combination with zoledronic acid in men with metastatic prostate cancer
✍ Scribed by M. Dror Michaelson; Donald S. Kaufman; Philip Kantoff; William K. Oh; Matthew R. Smith
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 118 KB
- Volume
- 107
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND.
Metastatic prostate cancer is characterized by the presence of osteoblastic bone metastases. Bone metastases account for most of the morbidity from this disease. Inhibition of osteoclast activity with the potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid reduces skeletal complications and decreases serum levels of biochemical bone turnover markers compared with placebo. Atrasentan is an investigational agent that inhibits endothelin‐1 receptor, resulting in decreased osteoblast activity.
METHODS.
The effects of atrasentan alone versus combination therapy with atrasentan and zoledronic acid were investigated on bone turnover markers in men with bone metastases from prostate cancer. Forty‐four men were randomized to receive either atrasentan alone or combination therapy, and 33 completed at least 12 weeks of treatment and were included in the primary analysis.
RESULTS.
Treatment with the combination resulted in significantly lower serum levels of N‐telopeptide, a marker of bone resorption, compared with treatment with atrasentan alone. There was no difference between groups in serum levels of bone‐specific alkaline phosphatase, a marker of bone formation, at 12 weeks. Commonly observed adverse effects were edema, rhinitis, fatigue, and shortness of breath, most of which were NCI CTC (version 3.0) Grade 1. No Grade 4 or 5 treatment‐related toxicities were observed. There was minimal clinical efficacy, with no objective responses and only 1 prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response.
CONCLUSIONS.
There is no evidence for additive or synergistic effects of combination therapy with atrasentan and zoledronic acid on bone turnover markers in men with metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Thirty patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer were treated with sequentially administered methotrexate (MTX) and piritrexim (PTX). The treatment schedule consisted of intravenous (IV) MTX (50 mg/m') administered on day 1 and oral PTX (75 mg/mz) administered twice daily on day
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The primary objective of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of capecitabine and gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with androgen‐independent prostate cancer (AIPCa) who experienced disease progression after taxane therapy. The secondary objective wa
## Abstract ## Background. The aims of this study were to determine the recommended dose (RD) in combination chemotherapy of S‐1 and carboplatin in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer (phase I) and to examine response rate and toxicities at RD (phase II). ## Methods. S‐1 was given o
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. The addition of diethylstilbestrol to docetaxel modified tubulin composition and improved the response of prostate cancer to chemotherapy in preclinical models. An attempt was made to recapitulate the observations in a clinical trial. ## METHODS. Twenty‐nine patients w