𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium

✦ LIBER ✦

Randomized, double-blind, half-side comparison of a monophasic CPM versus a biphasic NASHA dermal filler in the treatment of nasolabial folds

Book ID: 122775073
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2014
Tongue: English
Weight: 47 KB
Volume: 70
Category: Article
ISSN: 1097-6787
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.01.081

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Randomized, double-blind, half-side comp

Randomized, double-blind, half-side comparison of a monophasic and a biphasic stabilized hyaluronic acid–based gel of nonanimal origin in the treatment of nasolabial folds

📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 52 KB

Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic

Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of severe nasolabial lines – 6-month interim results of a randomized, evaluator-blinded, intra-individual comparison study

✍ Benjamin Ascher; Christiane Bayerl; Patrick Brun; Philippe Kestemont; Berthold R 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 258 KB

A phase II, randomized, double-blind cli

A phase II, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing safety and efficacy of a metallic cannula versus a standard needle for dermal filler injections (hyaluronic acid gel) for the treatment of nasogenian folds

📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 47 KB