𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Randomized comparison of G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: effects on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy

✍ Scribed by Spitzer, G; Adkins, D; Mathews, M; Velasquez, W; Bowers, C; Dunphy, F; Kronmueller, N; Niemeyer, R; McIntyre, W; Petruska, P

Book ID
110010324
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
112 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1188

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Mobilization effects of G-CSF, GM-CSF, a
Mobilization effects of G-CSF, GM-CSF, and darbepoetin-α for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
✍ Shi Nae Kim; Joon Ho Moon; Jong Gwang Kim; Yee Soo Chae; Yoon Young Cho; Soo Jun 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 170 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The effects of GM‐/G‐CSF and darbepoetin‐α on stem cell mobilization were investigated. From February 2005 to March 2007, 30 allogeneic sibling donors were randomly assigned to a G‐CSF group (5 μg/kg/day for 5–7 days) or triple group (GM‐CSF 10 μg/kg/day on 1st and 2nd day, G‐CSF 5 μg/k

Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method
Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit–GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function
✍ Erin T. Alexander; Jeanne A. Towery; Ashley N. Miller; Cindy Kramer; Kathy R. Ho 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 212 KB