𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis

✍ Scribed by Tuula Kiviluoto; Jukka Sirén; Pekka Luukkonen; Eero Kivilaakso

Book ID
117310832
Publisher
The Lancet
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
72 KB
Volume
351
Category
Article
ISSN
0140-6736

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Randomized clinical trial of open versus
Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis
✍ M. Johansson; A. Thune; L. Nelvin; M. Stiernstam; B. Westman; L. Lundell 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 125 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## Background The aim of this prospective trial was to determine whether surgical approach (open versus laparoscopic) had an impact on morbidity and postoperative recovery after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. ## Methods Seventy patients who met the criteria for acute cholec

Comparison of laparoscopic and minilap c
Comparison of laparoscopic and minilap cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
✍ P. C. Calhoun; L. H. Adams; M. R. Adams 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 324 KB

The charts of all patients with acute cholecystitis undergoing either laparoscopic or minilap cholecystectomy at the Chinle Comprehensive Health Care Facility between October 1, 1991, and August 15, 1993, were retrospectively reviewed. During that period, 54 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecyst