๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

โœ Scribed by George B Hanna; Sami M Shimi; Alfred Cuschieri

Book ID
117310806
Publisher
The Lancet
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
62 KB
Volume
351
Category
Article
ISSN
0140-6736

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional
Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional culture systems: Effects on growth and productivity of BHK cells
โœ P. M. Alves; J. L. Moreira; J. M. Rodrigues; J. G. Aunins; M. J. T. Carrondo ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 327 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The influence of surface growth (two-dimensional microcarriers) and three-dimensional growth (aggregates and macroporous supports) in agitated, suspended batch culture systems upon growth and productivity of BHK was compared. Cultures using three porous microcarriers (CultiSpher G, Cellsnow EX, and