✦ LIBER ✦

Random fractals generated by oscillations of the uniform empirical process

✍ Scribed by Zacharie Dindar

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 116 KB
Volume: 50
Category: Article
ISSN: 0167-7152
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7152(00)00105-x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

The Hausdor dimension of the set generated by exceptional oscillations of the uniform empirical process is studied. We correct a former result obtained by Deheuvels and Mason (1995, Ann. Probab. 23, 355 -387).

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Strong limit theorems for oscillation mo

Strong limit theorems for oscillation moduli of the uniform empirical process

✍ David M. Mason; Galen R. Shorack; Jon A. Wellner 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 591 KB

A strong limit theorem for the oscillati

A strong limit theorem for the oscillation modulus of the uniform empirical quantile process

✍ David M. Mason 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 823 KB

Non-Uniform Bounds for the Error in the

Non-Uniform Bounds for the Error in the Central Limit Theorem for Random Fields Generated by Functions of Independent Random Variables

✍ Lothar Heinrich 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 824 KB

1) a{.) denotes the smallest a-algebra generated by the RV's in braces.

On the Hausdorff Dimension of the Set Ge

On the Hausdorff Dimension of the Set Generated by Exceptional Oscillations of a Two-Parameter Wiener Process

✍ Zacharie Dindar 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 173 KB

proved that for 0 \* 1 the set where W$(t) is a standard Wiener process. A corresponding result is obtained when W$ is replaced by a two-parameter Wiener process.

An empirical comparison of random number

An empirical comparison of random numbers acquired by computer-generation and from the Rand tables

✍ J.Richard Landis; Alvan R. Feinstein 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 341 KB

The use of Monte Carlo and other statistical procedures that depend on randomization of the observed data has been inhibited by uncertainty about the validity of random numbers generated by a computer. In the empirical test performed here, computergenerated numbers appeared to be just as "random" as