✦ LIBER ✦

Random field effects on the phase diagrams of spin-1/2 Ising model on a honeycomb lattice

✍ Scribed by Yusuf Yüksel; Ümit Akıncı; Hamza Polat

Book ID: 113849257
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2012
Tongue: English
Weight: 677 KB
Volume: 391
Category: Article
ISSN: 0378-4371
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2011.09.009

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

On the random field Ising model in a hon

On the random field Ising model in a honeycomb lattice

✍ Douglas F. de Albuquerque; I.P. Fittipaldi; J.R. de Sousa; N.O. Moreno 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 124 KB

Phase diagrams and tricritical behavior

Phase diagrams and tricritical behavior in a spin-2 transverse Ising model with a crystal field on honeycomb lattice

✍ Wei Jiang; Guo-zhu Wei; Zi-Hua Xin 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 116 KB

Phase diagrams and tricritical behavior

Phase diagrams and tricritical behavior in mixed spin-1 and spin-32 Ising model on honeycomb lattice

✍ G.Z Wei; Z.H Xin; Jiang Wei 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 168 KB

Surface phase diagrams of the spin-1 Isi

Surface phase diagrams of the spin-1 Ising model with a random surface field

✍ Zhen-ya Li; Sen-lin Xu; D.L. Lin; Thomas F. George 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 244 KB

Phase Diagrams of the Semi-Infinite Spin

Phase Diagrams of the Semi-Infinite Spin-1/2 Ising Model and Spin-1/2 Ising Film in a Random Transverse Surface Field

✍ B. Laaboudi; M. Saber; M. Kerouad 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 221 KB 👁 2 views

The exact phase diagrams of spin-1 Ising

The exact phase diagrams of spin-1 Ising model on a two-layer Bethe lattice

✍ Erhan Albayrak; Osman Canko 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 431 KB

The two-layer spin-1 Ising model on the Bethe lattice is studied in terms of the intralayer coupling constants J 1 and J 2 of the two layers, interlayer coupling constant J 3 between the layers and the external magnetic fields, which are coupled to the two layers and assumed to be different for each