## Abstract ## BACKGROUND To the authors' knowledge, consensus is lacking regarding the relative long‐term efficacy of radical prostatectomy (RP) versus conventional‐dose external beam radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. ## METHODS A
Radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate carcinoma : The butcher and the baker selling their wares
✍ Scribed by Judd W. Moul
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 50 KB
- Volume
- 95
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The current study compares the use of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy in the treatment of patients with prostate carcinoma and concludes that radical prostatectomy is more beneficial than external beam radiation therapy for low‐risk and intermediate‐risk men with this common disease. However, the issue remains a matter of debate between urologic surgeons and radiation oncologists with regard to the treatment of localized prostate carcinoma.
See also pages 215–8 and 281–6.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The authors thank Ms. Nebahat Gu ¨rses and Ms. Sylvia Schno ¨ger for their expert help in performing the in situ hybridizations.