𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Radiation effects on development

✍ Scribed by Marco De Santis; Elena Cesari; E. Nobili; Gianluca Straface; Anna Franca Cavaliere; Alessandro Caruso


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
138 KB
Volume
81
Category
Article
ISSN
1542-975X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

It has been widely reported that prenatal exposure to ionizing radiation can interfere with embryonic and fetal development, depending on dose and gestational age in which exposure occurs. According to several studies on animal models, different well‐defined stages during prenatal life can be distinguished in relation to teratogenic effects. During the preimplantation stage, elevated doses of radiation can result in abortion, while lower doses may produce genomic damage that is usually repaired. On the other hand, during the organogenesis stage in mice (embryonic day 6.5 [E6.5] to E13.5), irradiation is associated with increased incidence of malformation and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Later exposure is linked to brain damage. Doses used in animal studies are generally higher than those used for diagnostic procedures in humans. Usually, radiation exposure to diagnostic range (<0.05 Gy = 5 rads) is not associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies. In human studies, elevated doses produce adverse outcomes, depending on stage of development, as in animal studies. Blastogenesis (up to two weeks) is associated with failure to implant or no significant health effects. An increased risk of malformation and growth retardation can be observed for two to seven weeks exposure (organogenesis stage), while exposure at later stages (fetogenesis) is mainly associated with brain damage. In this review we focus on the relevance of estimating the cumulative dose of radiation to the fetus and the gestational age in which exposure occurs, to provide appropriate counseling to pregnant women. Birth Defects Research (Part C) 81:177–182, 2007. Β© 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Radiation effects on HDPE/EVA blends
✍ Siqin Dalai; Chen Wenxiu πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 116 KB
Radiation effects on LDPE/EVA blends
✍ Siqin Dalai; Chen Wenxiu πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 99 KB
Effects of implantable biomaterials on r
✍ Kerstin M. Stenson; James M. Balter; John H. Campbell; William R. Carroll πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 213 KB

Background. It is generally known that radiation dose is enhanced in front of and reduced behind metallic plates. This study evaluates metallic, ceramic, and bioabsorbable facial reconstruction materials for their differential effects on radiation dosimetry. Methods. Commercially pure titanium (cpt