𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Racial and ethnic differences in treatment and survival among adults with primary extremity soft-tissue sarcoma

✍ Scribed by Steve R. Martinez; Anthony S. Robbins; Frederick J. Meyers; Richard J. Bold; Vijay P. Khatri; James E. Goodnight Jr


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
93 KB
Volume
112
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND.

Limb preservation is preferred to amputation for patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS). Disparities in the treatment and outcomes of several malignancies have been reported, but not for ESTS. The authors assessed racial/ethnic differences in patient‐ and tumor‐specific characteristics, treatment, and disease‐specific survival in a population of adults with ESTS.

METHODS.

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 6406 adult patients with ESTS who were diagnosed and treated between 1988 and 2003. Patients were categorized into 1 of 4 racial/ethnic groups: whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians. Comparisons of treatment and disease‐specific survival were conducted with regression models that adjusted for patient age, sex, SEER geographic region, extent of disease, tumor grade, tumor size, and histology.

RESULTS.

Relative to whites, blacks received lower rates of adjuvant radiation with surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.66–0.90). Hispanics received significantly lower rates of limb‐sparing surgery (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.97). In a multivariate analysis controlling for patient age, sex, SEER geographic region, extent of disease, tumor grade, tumor size, and histology, blacks displayed a worse disease‐specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39; 95% CI, 1.13–1.70), whereas Asians demonstrated superior disease‐specific survival (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46–0.97).

CONCLUSIONS.

There were significant racial/ethnic differences in treatment and survival among adults with ESTS. Compared with whites, survival was poorer for blacks but better for Asians. These disparities were not explained by differences in patient or tumor characteristics. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Racial/ethnic differences in social vuln
✍ Hortensia Amaro; Mary Jo Larson; Joanne Gampel; Erin Richardson; Andrea Savage; 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 134 KB

## Abstract Little attention has been given to racial/ethnic differences in studies of co‐occurring disorders among women. In this article, we present findings from analyses conducted on the influence of racial/ethnic differences on the demographic and clinical profiles of 2,534 women in the Substa

Prognostic significance of grading and s
✍ Tadashi Hasegawa; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Ryohei Yokoyama; Toru Umeda; Yoshihiro Mat 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 165 KB 👁 2 views

## Background: The predictive value of histologic grading and staging systems for overall survival in different types of adult soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk is unclear. ## Methods: Histologic slides from 193 patients with primary tumors were reviewed for diagnosis, and ki-67 (m