๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Quantum mechanics with explicit time dependence

โœ Scribed by John Rogers; Donald Spector


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
263 KB
Volume
170
Category
Article
ISSN
0375-9601

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Time-dependent linear Hamiltonian system
โœ Jorge Rezende ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 337 KB

In this Letter, a theorem on time-dependent linear Hamiltonian systems is recalled and its connection with the SchrOdinger equation is discussed. The kernel of the evolution operator of such quantum systems is computed. Furthermore, the Lewis and Riesenfeld theory for systems with many degrees of fr

Exact solution to a general quantum mech
โœ Rafael Almeida; Daniel A. Morales ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 140 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

Exact analytical solutions are found for the quantum mechanical problem of a particle subject to a time-dependent potential with time-dependent boundary conditions. The method of solution employs time-dependent invariants, rescaling of space and time variables along with an unitary transformation. S

Explicit Time Marching Methods for the T
โœ C.H. Tai; D.C. Chiang; Y.P. Su ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 524 KB

these methods are very good candidates for the computations of the time-dependent compressible flows. Although Four explicit type time marching methods, including one proposed by the authors, are examined. The TVD conditions of these methods succeed in different cases, detailed comparithis method ar

Time of Arrival in Quantum Mechanics
โœ J.G. Muga; S. Brouard; D. Macias ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1995 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 720 KB

An expression for the quantum time of arrival based on the current density is discussed and justified operationally by means of complex potentials that absorb the incoming wave in a finite distance without reflection or transmission. Previous arguments denying the possibility of defining the time of