✦ LIBER ✦

Quantitative assessment of callus distraction using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

✍ Scribed by A. Reiter; D. Sabo; J. Pfeil; H. Cotta

Book ID: 105971451
Publisher: Springer
Year: 1997
Tongue: English
Weight: 264 KB
Volume: 21
Category: Article
ISSN: 0341-2695
DOI: 10.1007/s002640050114

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: Comparison with vertebral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography

✍ A. -M. Laval-Jeantet; C. Bergot; M. Williams; K. Davidson; M. Laval-Jeantet 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 651 KB

Body composition assessment by dual-ener

Body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

✍ A. Andreoli; G. Scalzo; S. Masala; U. Tarantino; G. Guglielmi 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer 🌐 Italian ⚖ 695 KB

Vertebral fracture assessment by new dua

Vertebral fracture assessment by new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

✍ Alberto Bazzocchi; Paolo Spinnato; Federica Fuzzi; Danila Diano; Antonio M. Mors 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 738 KB

X-ray imaging sensor using CdTe crystals

X-ray imaging sensor using CdTe crystals for dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

✍ Ohtsuchi, T.; Tsutsui, H.; Ohmori, K.; Baba, S. 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 IEEE 🌐 English ⚖ 589 KB

Meat tenderness evaluation using dual en

Meat tenderness evaluation using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)

✍ C. Kröger; C.M. Bartle; J.G. West; R.W. Purchas; C.E. Devine 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 480 KB

Clinical reproducibility of dual energy

Clinical reproducibility of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

✍ Pamela Williams-Russo; John H. Healey; Ted P. Szatrowski; Robert Schneider; Step 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 663 KB

## Abstract Dual energy x‐ray absorptiometry is a technique advocated for the measurement of bone mass throughout the skeleton, and recently it has been used to measure changes in periprosthetic bone mass after joint replacement. The accuracy and precision of the method in clinical patient populati