𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Quantitative and qualitative differences in protein expression between papillary thyroid carcinoma and normal thyroid tissue

✍ Scribed by Lewis M. Brown; Steve M. Helmke; Stephen W. Hunsucker; Romana T. Netea-Maier; Simon A. Chiang; David E. Heinz; Kenneth R. Shroyer; Mark W. Duncan; Bryan R. Haugen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
505 KB
Volume
45
Category
Article
ISSN
0899-1987

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

In order to better understand basic mechanisms of tumor development and identify potential new biomarkers, we have performed difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) and peptide mass fingerprinting on pooled protein extracts from patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) compared with matched normal thyroid tissue. Image analysis of DIGE gels comparing PTC and matched normal thyroid tissue protein indicated that 25% of the protein spots were differentially expressed at a 2.5‐fold cutoff and 35% at two‐fold. Comparison between two different pools of protein from normal thyroid tissues revealed differential protein expression of only 4% at 2.5‐fold and 6% at two‐fold cutoff. One hundred ninety‐two protein spots were identified by MALDI‐TOFMS, representing 90 distinct proteins. Excluding albumin, globins and thyroglobulin, imaging software determined 31 proteins to be differentially expressed at the two‐fold (or greater) level. Individual gel comparisons (PTC vs. matched normal) from five patients established that 15/31 (48%) of these proteins exhibited statistically significant differential expression. Previously identified molecular markers in this group of proteins include cathepsin B, cytokeratin 19, and galectin‐3. Novel differentially expressed proteins include S100A6, moesin, HSP70 (BiP), peroxiredoxin 2, protein phosphatase 2, selenium binding protein 1, vitamin D binding protein, and proteins involved in mitochondrial function. The use of two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE) revealed a significantly altered protein mass and/or pI in 10%–15% of proteins, suggesting alternatively spliced forms and other posttranslational modification of proteins revealed by this approach. We confirmed S100A6 as a potentially useful biomarker using immunohistochemical analysis (85% sensitivity and 69% specificity for distinguishing benign from malignant thyroid neoplasms). In summary, proteomic analysis of PTC using DIGE and mass spectrometry has confirmed several known biomarkers, uncovered novel potential biomarkers, and provided insights into global pathophysiologic changes in PTC. Many of the differences observed would not have been detected by genomic or other proteomic approaches. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Expression ofMet protein and urokinase-t
✍ Zanetti, Antonio; Stoppacciaro, Antonella; Marzullo, Antonella; Ciabatta, Maria; 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 314 KB 👁 1 views

Met protein encoded by MET oncogene is the high affinity receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/scatter factor (SF). HGF/SF has to be cleaved in its heterodimeric form by the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to become active as a ligand for Met receptor. The expression of Met protein