## Abstract This study compares two techniques for uncertainty quantification in chemistry computations, one based on sensitivity analysis and error propagation, and the other on stochastic analysis using polynomial chaos techniques. The two constructions are studied in the context of H~2~ο£ΏO~2~ ign
β¦ LIBER β¦
Quantifying uncertainty in reliability and safety studies
β Scribed by Patrick D.T. O'Connor
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 459 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0026-2714
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Quantifying uncertainty in chemical syst
β
M. T. Reagan; H. N. Najm; P. P. PΓ©bay; O. M. Knio; R. G. Ghanem
π
Article
π
2005
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 249 KB
Ignorance and uncertainty in reliability
β
M. Dohnal
π
Article
π
1992
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 845 KB
Probability and uncertainty in nuclear s
β
M.E PatΓ©-Cornell
π
Article
π
1986
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 800 KB
Haplotype uncertainty in association stu
β
F.K. Mensah; M.S. Gilthorpe; C.F. Davies; L.J. Keen; P.J. Adamson; E. Roman; G.J
π
Article
π
2007
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 131 KB
## Abstract Inferring haplotypes from genotype data is commonly undertaken in population genetic association studies. Within such studies the importance of accounting for uncertainty in the inference of haplotypes is well recognised. We investigate the effectiveness of correcting for uncertainty us
A generalised model for PWR for use on s
β
R. O'Neil
π
Article
π
1982
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 378 KB
Reliability of quantifying foot and ankl
β
Kristy J. Rose; Joshua Burns; Monique M. Ryan; Robert A. Ouvrier; Kathryn N. Nor
π
Article
π
2008
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 84 KB