๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Quality of life

โœ Scribed by Charles R. Smart; Jerome W. Yates


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
300 KB
Volume
60
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The term quality of life (QL) is a global characterization usually consisting of the following factors: physical function, symptoms from disease and/or treatment, occupational and social interactions, and psychological parameters, including mood with some overall assessment of well-being, such as happiness or satisfaction. For the purposes of individual patient management, the physician often assesses many of these in the process of making decisions about cancer care. The aggregate assessment of QL in groups of patients is more difficult. The increasing subjectivity and difficulty in measurement as medical observers move from the physical (objective parameters) to the psychosocial (subjective parameters) has hindered our ability to study QL. The changing status of the patient from initial symptomatic disease, to the incapacitation related to the treatment and/or the ongoing course of the disease often leading to death makes the measurement of QL a moving target. One must be very specific as to the malignancy, the status of disease, the treatments with their side effects and sequela, and the time of measurement in this dynamic spectrum, if the data is to be comparable and to permit generalizations. For the purposes of clinical trials the emphasis remains with the physical factors: function and symptom control. Even these factors are difficult to assess consistently, making the aggregation of such data from similarly treated groups of patients sometimes suspect. The ability to determine the impact of disease and treatment on these factors in a reliable manner could make possible, with aggregated data from many patients, more objective assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of a particular therapy. Late sequelae of treatment may also be important. When cure or prolonged survival are not likely or possible then the ability to determine the probable effects, physical and psychosocial, of a specific treatment on an individual patient is valuable. Treatment then can be guided to some extent by QL considerations.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Quality of life
โœ Decosse, Jerome J. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 11 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views
Measuring quality of life
โœ J. F. Hamming; J. De Vries ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 52 KB
Quality of life and diabetes
โœ Richard R. Rubin; Mark Peyrot ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 147 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Life events and life quality variability
โœ Alex Zautra; Joseph Maio ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 279 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Quality of life in social phobia
โœ Steven A. Safren; Richard G. Heimberg; Elissa J. Brown; Christian Holle ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 80 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The person's perception of his or her quality of life has been neglected in studies of mental health in general and anxiety disorders in particular. However, the judgement of the impact of a mental disorder based on symptomatic distress while ignoring one's overall quality of life is incomplete. In