a i d the Members of Quality of Life Committee of the EORTC Genitourinary Group Background. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the need to include parameters representing the patients' view of their conditions that, therefore, are more subjective in nature. As a first effort t
Quality of life and survival prediction in terminal cancer patients : A multicenter study
β Scribed by Antonio Vigano; Nora Donaldson; Irene J. Higginson; Eduardo Bruera; Salaheddin Mahmud; Maria Suarez-Almazor
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 98 KB
- Volume
- 101
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND
It remains unclear whether healthβrelated quality of life (HRQoL) measurements from patients and staff can be combined with medical data to predict survival in patients with terminal cancer.
METHODS
The correlations between survival and potential healthβrelated qualityβofβlife (HRQoL) prognostic variables were explored in 2 independent cohorts of patients with terminal cancer (248 patients in Cohort 1 and 756 patients in Cohort 2) after adjusting for clinical and demographics variables using Cox regression models.
RESULTS
At the onset of the terminal phase (Cohort 1), the hazards of dying increased by 28% in the presence of dyspnea and by 68% in the presence of nausea/emesis; however, the most important predictors of worse survival were the presence of liver metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.8β3.8), lung tumor (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7β3.4), and tumor burden (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4β2.7). In contrast, for patients who were seen in later stages of their terminal disease (Cohort 2), dyspnea (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1β1.9) and the coexistence of weakness with a diagnosis of digestive tumors (HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 1.2β21.8), breast tumors (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6β6.2), and genitourinary tumors (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6β7.8) were more predictive of survival than the type of tumor primary. Emotional functioning along with anxiety, spiritual distress, and lack of insight were not associated consistently with survival in both cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS
Health care professionals should focus on physical HRQoL indicators, such as nausea and emesis, dyspnea, and weakness, to gather prognostic clues in patients with terminal cancer. These symptoms may reflect consequences of cancer cachexia and the progress of patients toward this terminal syndrome. Psychosocial distress did not appear to be associated consistently with survival; however, future studies should clarify further the prognostic significance of βpositive attitudesβ, such as hope and optimism, in patients with advanced cancer. Cancer 2004. Β© 2004 American Cancer Society.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: In patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (hnscc) the estimated prognosis is usually based on the tnm classification. the relative weight of the three contributing parameters is often not completely clear. moreover, the impact of other important clinical variables such a