Donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) is a major surgical operation for the benefit of the recipient. Justification of procedure mandates knowledge of the possible physical and psychological negative effects on the donor. We prospectively and longitudina
Quality of life and psychiatric complications after adult living donor liver transplantation
โ Scribed by Yesim Erim; Mingo Beckmann; Camino Valentin-Gamazo; Massimo Malago; Andrea Frilling; Joerg F. Schlaak; Guido Gerken; Christoph E. Broelsch; Wolfgang Senf
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 137 KB
- Volume
- 12
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1527-6465
- DOI
- 10.1002/lt.20907
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
We investigated the psychosocial effects of a right hepatectomy on donors for adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). Questionnaires were sent to 66 actual donors, who had undergone ALDLT between August 1998 and September 2003, as well as to 139 potential donors, who had been examined as possible candidates for ALDLT; the latter had been excluded and had not undergone surgery. All actual donors reported full recovery within an average period of 14.41 (standard deviation ฯญ 8.86) weeks; all had returned to their preoperative employment. In preparation for ALDLT, they had received significantly more support from their families in the decision-making process than the potential donors had ( t ฯญ 2.02; degree of freedom ฯญ 79; P ฯญ 0.047); they also felt better informed about donation than the potential donors (t ฯญ 2.04; df ฯญ 64; P ฯญ 0.045). Psychiatric problems occurred in 6 (14%) female donors in the perioperative period, mostly in connection with unrealistic outcome expectations. Donors with severe postoperative complications (n ฯญ 3) demonstrated higher scores of psychiatric symptoms (chi-square ฯญ 6.39; df ฯญ 2; P ฯญ 0.041). When we compared potential and actual donors, a significant difference in emotional quality of life was not demonstrated (t ฯญ 0.41; df ฯญ 76; P ฯญ 0.684), and it corresponded to that of the normative sample. For donors, perceived emotional quality of life did not depend on the course of recovery of the recipients. Six to 9 months after donation, potential donors reported a significantly higher physical quality of life than actual donors (t ฯญ 2.20; df ฯญ 56; P ฯญ 0.032). In conclusion, female donors, donors with their own major complications, or donors with unrealistic outcome expectations should be provided with adequate psychosocial care. With regard to the psychosocial outcome, ALDLT is a safe intervention for the donor.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Biliary complications occur more frequently after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) versus deceased donor liver transplantation, and they remain the most common and intractable problems after LDLT. The anatomical limitations of multiple tiny bile ducts and the differential blood supplies of
As the number of living donor (LD) and deceased donor (DD) split-liver transplants (SLTs) have increased over the last 5 years, so too has the interest in liver regeneration after such partial-liver transplants. We looked at liver regeneration, as measured by computed tomography (CT) volumetrics, to
In living donor liver transplantation, the safety of the donor operation is the highest priority. The introduction of the right lobe graft was late because of concerns about donor safety. We investigated donor liver regeneration by the types of resected segments as well as recipients to assess that
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) decreases the shortage of liver grafts for patients in need of a liver transplant, but it involves 2 patients: a recipient and a living donor. Despite the magnitude of the procedure for LDLT donors, only a few studies have investigated the effect of LDLT on