## Abstract ## __Background.__ The management of patients with head and neck cancer is complex, and implementation of an integrated care program might improve the quality of care. ## __Methods.__ A prospective before–after study was performed in 1 clinic for head and neck oncology on 311 adults
Quality of integrated care for patients with head and neck cancer: Development and measurement of clinical indicators
✍ Scribed by Mariëlle M. M. T. J. Ouwens; Henri A. M. Marres; Rosella R. P. Hermens; Marlies M. E. Hulscher; Frank J. A. van den Hoogen; Richard P. Grol; Hub C. H. Wollersheim
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 205 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1043-3074
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background.
To improve the quality of integrated care, we developed indicators for assessing current practice in a large reference center for head and neck oncology.
Methods.
We defined a set of indicators based on integrated care literature, national evidence‐based guidelines for patients with head and neck cancer, and the opinions of professionals and patients. We tested this set regarding assessement of current practice and clinimetric characteristics.
Results.
The final set consisted of 8 integrated care indicators and 23 specific indicators for patients with head and neck cancer. Current practice assessment produced high scores for the integrated care indicators, but the specific indicators showed room for improvement. The practice test showed that 9 indicators had good applicability.
Conclusions.
The indicators, while based on evidence‐based guidelines and the principles of integrated care, should incorporate patients' opinions and include a practice test. Our results show that the quality of integrated care for patients with head and neck cancer could be improved. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2007
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. In the current study, the authors focused on determinants influencing the quality of care and variations in the actual quality of integrated care for patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to estimate whether there is room for improvement. ## METHODS. The auth
Background. To employ patient-reported speech outcome data collected on head and neck cancer (HNC) surveys, there is a need to determine (1) the relationship of patient ratings to speech language pathologist (SLP) ratings and (2) whether patients' attitudes toward their speech are an important eleme
## BACKGROUND. The rise of managed care has increased interest in measuring, reporting, and improving quality of care. To date, quality assessment has relied on a leading indicator approach, which may miss important variations in care. The authors developed cancer specific indicators using a novel
## Abstract ## Background Multiple oral complaints develop during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, and quality of life is affected after treatment. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the quality of life, oral function, and oral symptoms in a cohort of patients during and af