✦ LIBER ✦

Quality assurance in the EORTC phase III randomised ‘boost vs. no boost’ trial for breast conserving therapy: Comparison of the results of two individual case reviews performed early and late during the accrual period

✍ Scribed by Philip M.P. Poortmans; Fatma Ataman; Jacques Bernard Davis; Harry Bartelink; Jean-Claude Horiot; Marianne Pierart; Laurence Collette; Geertjan Van Tienhoven

Book ID: 118496468
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 108 KB
Volume: 76
Category: Article
ISSN: 0167-8140
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.04.001

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

3–40 Quality Assurance in the EORTC Phas

3–40 Quality Assurance in the EORTC Phase III Randomised ‘Boost Vs No Boost’ Trial for Breast Conserving Therapy: Comparison of the Results of Two Individual Case Reviews Performed Early and Late During the Accrual Period

✍ Klein, E.E. 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 59 KB

579 Quality assurance in the EORTC phase

579 Quality assurance in the EORTC phase III randomised ‘boost versus no boost’ trial in breast conserving therapy: evaluation and comparison of the two individual case reviews done at the beginning and at the end of the accrual period

📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 125 KB