𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

QCD sum rules with two-point correlation function

✍ Scribed by Hungchong Kim; Su Houng Lee; Makoto Oka


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
227 KB
Volume
670
Category
Article
ISSN
0375-9474

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We construct three different sum rules from the two-point correlation function with pion, i fd4xeiq'x(O[TJN(X)JN(O)l~r(p)), beyond the soft-pion limit. The PS and PV coupling schemes in the construction of the phenomenological side are carefully considered in each sum rule. We discuss the dependence of the result on the specific Dirac structure and identify the source of the dependence by making specific models for higher resonances.

Within QCD sum rules, the rNN coupling constant, gTrN, is often calculated [1,2], for example, from the correlation function,

/ d4xe~q'~(O[TJp(x)Jn(O)lrc+(p)) ,

(1) i where Jp is the proton interpolating field [3] and Jn is the neutron interpolating field. Shiomi and Hatsuda [1] considered i~/5 Dirac structure from this correlation function in the soft-pion limit (p, -+ 0). Later, Birse and Krippa [2] pointed out that the use of soft-pion limit does not constitute an independent sum rule from the nucleon chiral-odd sum rule, and proposed to look at the Dirac structure, i75 ~, beyond the soft-pion limit.

Recently [4], we have pointed out that the previous calculations of this sort have dependence on how one models the phenomenological side; either using the pseudoscalar (PS) or the pseudovector (PV) coupling scheme. Beyond the soft-pion limit, we presented a new sum rule for the 75a~,q~'p " structure. This sum rule is independent of the coupling schemes and provides g,N relatively close to its empirical value.

Then we ask, can we get similar results from the other Dirac structures, i3, 5 and i3'5 ~, constructed beyond the soft-pion limit ? If not, what are the reasons for the differences ? In this work, we will try to answer these questions by studying all three sum rules and investigating the reliability of each sum rule.

In calculating the OPE of Eq. ( 1), we only keep the quark-antiquark component of the pion wave function, D,~ -(Olu~(x)d ~, (0)Ir+(p)) , (2) *JSPS Fellow. tAvH Fellow.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Duality violation in QCD Sum Rules with
✍ MartΓ­n GonzΓ‘lez-Alonso; Antonio Pich; Joaquim Prades πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 835 KB

We analyse the so-called violations of quark-hadron duality in Finite Energy Sum Rules (FESRs) with the LR correlator, through the study of the possible high-energy behavior of the LR spectral function, taking into account all known short-distance constraints and the experimental tau-decay data. In

Nonleptonic hyperon decays with QCD sum
✍ E.M. Henley; W.-Y.P. Hwang; L.S. Kisslinger πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 144 KB

Despite measurements which date more than 20 years ago, no straightforward solution of the ratio of the parity-conserving (P-wave) to parity-violating (S-wave) decays of the hyperons has been obtained. Here we use two 2-point methods in QCD sum rules to examine the problem. We find that resonance co

Sum rule of the correlation function
✍ StanisaΜ΅w MrΓ³wczyΕ„ski πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 275 KB