This study extended the work of Sorensen and Pilgrim (2002) by examining the institutional affiliations of authors in leading criminology and criminal justice journals in the subsequent five-year period after their study. Additionally, this study replicated Fabianic's ( 2002) study, by assessing the
Publication productivity of criminal justice faculty in criminal justice journals
โ Scribed by David Fabianic
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 111 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0047-2352
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
An important dimension of university faculty life is publication expectation. Often the level of publication productivity is used to assess general program prestige or to evaluate individual faculty performance. The publication rates of faculty in PhD and master-level programs have been unclear. This study examined the publication rates using a general list of criminal justice journals, and a select list of the leading journals, over a five-year period. The faculty members were located in criminal justice programs that granted PhD and master degrees. Publication productivity rates were established for the two different degree level programs, and the institutions with the strongest publication rates were identified. Publication rates are only one factor used in the assessment of program quality and the relationship of publication rates to other program features is discussed.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Responding to the requirements of the modern scientific community, Elsevier is pleased to announce that all volumes of the