Psychological predictors of CCK4-induced panic-like symptoms
✍ Scribed by Ilona Jerabek; Jean-Philippe Boulenger; Yvon-Jacques Lavallée; François B. Jolicoeur
- Book ID
- 101280428
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 138 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6222
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The present study investigated whether psychosomatic reaction to panicogenic CCK 4 administration can be predicted based on basal and pre-administration psychological traits and characteristics. Sixteen healthy volunteers participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over experiment in which they were subjected to CCK 4 and placebo challenge. One week prior to experimentation, they completed a battery of self-administered psychological inventories, including the trait form of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T), Chambless Anxious Cognitions Inventory (CACI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90). The state form of STAI (STAI-S) was administered before and after the injections of CCK 4 (25 mg i.v.) and placebo. Various elements of the panic-like experience (latency and duration of symptoms, number and intensity of symptoms, fear of symptoms, and post-administration state anxiety) were recorded after both injections. The results of multiple regression analyses suggest that basal STAI-S, STAI-T and BDI are very good predictors of the number and intensity of CCK 4 -induced symptoms, the fear reaction to panic symptoms and post-injection state-anxiety. The SCL-90 scores were retained as the best predictor of placebo-induced panic-like symptoms. We conclude that substantial portions of variability in CCK 4 and placebo-induced panic-like reaction can be explained by basal psychological characteristics.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Experimental panic induction with cholecystokinin tetrapeptide (CCK‐4) is considered as a suitable model to investigate the pathophysiology of panic attacks. While only a few studies investigated the brain activation patterns following CCK‐4, no data are available on the putative involv