Protein–protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions
✍ Scribed by Lorber, David M. (author);Udo, Maria K. (author);Shoichet, Brian K. (author)
- Book ID
- 111753307
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 924 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0961-8368
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Most scoring functions for protein–protein docking algorithms are either atom‐based or residue‐based, with the former being able to produce higher quality structures and latter more tolerant to conformational changes upon binding. Earlier, we developed the ZRANK algorithm for reranking
The known protein structures have been analyzed to find out if there is any pattern in the type of residues used and their conformation at the two terminal positions of the polypeptide chains. While the N-terminal position is overwhelmingly occupied by Met (followed by Ala and Ser), the preference f
## Abstract A fast, empirical method, Mut‐pKa, is presented for predicting the p__K__~a~ values of ionizable residues in proteins based on mutation. The method compares the effect of mutating each residue that may act as a hydrogen bond donor or acceptor for the ionizable residue. The energetic eff
## Abstract The L‐azetidine‐2‐carboxylic acid (Aze) residue can be incorporated into proteins in the place of L‐proline, of which it is the lower homologue. This substitution alters the properties of proteins, especially of collagen. Conformational constraints in N‐acetyl‐Aze‐N′‐methylamide and in
## Abstract Understanding the key factors that influence the preferences of residue‐nucleotide interactions in specific protein‐RNA interactions has remained a research focus. We propose an effective approach to derive residue‐nucleotide propensity potentials through considering both the types of r