Protein recovery from surfactant precipitation
β Scribed by Shu Ian Cheng; David C. Stuckey
- Publisher
- American Institute of Chemical Engineers
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 244 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 8756-7938
- DOI
- 10.1002/btpr.671
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
The recovery of lysozyme from an aqueous solution containing precipitated lysozymeβAOT complexes formed by the direct addition of sodium bisβ(2βethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate (AOT) to a lysozyme solution was studied using both solvents, and a counterionic surfactant. Ethanol, methanol and solvent mixtures dissolved the surfactant precipitate and recovered lysozyme as a solid. Recovery efficiency and protein stability varied with the type of solvent used. An entirely different method of recovery was also evaluated using a counterionic surfactant: trioctylmethylammonium chloride (TOMAC) which bound to AOT releasing lysozyme into solution. Complete recovery (100%) of lysozyme was achieved at a molar ratio of 2:1 (TOMAC:AOT), and the original protein activity was maintained in the final aqueous phase. The recovered lysozyme retained its secondary structure as observed in circular dichroism (CD) spectra. Specific activity studies show that counterionic surfactant extraction does not alter the biological activity of the enzyme. Β© 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog.,, 2011
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The purification of two enzymes, β£-chymotrypsin and ribonuclease-A, was studied using sodium di-(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate (AOT) as precipitating ligand. The enzymes formed a water insoluble complex upon contact with AOT and precipitated from the aqueous solution. The molar ratio between AOT and