๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Prostate cancer screening. Appropriate choices?

โœ Scribed by Peter J. Littrup


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
719 KB
Volume
74
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Early detection of prostate cancer has produced distinct stage migration of prostate cancer to earlier, more curable disease through optimized combined use of digital rectal exam (DRE), transrectal ultrasound, and prostate specific antigen (PSA). Currently available and emerging data can be assessed according to the World Health Organization's established criteria. As a significant public health problem, prostate cancer meets almost all the criteria for screening.

While concerns about incomplete natural history, progression rates, and the need for better prognostic factors are valid, important social and public health issues also need to be considered. If future expenditures for terminal cancer care are minimized via reductions in therapy choices or coverage, no economic benefit for prostate cancer screening should exist. Narrow-focused attempts at cost reduction could inappropriately discourage high risk groups from participating in early detection programs, thereby eliminating the greatest potential benefit. Conversely, the greatest immediate cost-control issue for prostate cancer care in the United States could be the marked increased detection in men older than 75 years of age.

Current cost savings are possible with improved public health education about the appropriateness of early detection in the oldest age groups or those with significant preexisting medical conditions. Prostate cancer control perhaps requires a tailored approach of screening in high risk groups and more appropriate "case finding" in the lower risk, general population. The initial combination of PSA and DRE can result in early detection, which is both ethical and economic, for individual patients consulting with informed physicians. Cancer 1994; 74:2016-22.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Prostate cancer screening
โœ Freda E. Alexander ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 87 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Prostate cancer screening
โœ Reginald C. S. Ho ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 219 KB
Prostate cancer screening
โœ Gabriel Sandblom; Eberhard Varenhorst ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 72 KB
Screening for prostate cancer
โœ Sam D. Graham Jr. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 255 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views
Screening for prostate cancer
โœ Michael K. Brawer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 51 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Screening for prostate cancer has shown great promise in its ability to detect prostate cancer at a curable stage; however, significant problems exist with respect to our knowledge of its impact on prostate cancer mortality. For the properly informed patient with at least a 10year life expectancy, i

Screening for prostate cancer
โœ Kirkels, W. J. ;Rietbergen, J. B. W. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 417 KB