𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Prostaglandin E2 receptor heterogeneity and dysfunction in mammary tumor cells

✍ Scribed by Amy M. Fulton; John J. Laterra; Cynthia M. Hanchin


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
834 KB
Volume
139
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9541

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We have reported previously that murine mammary tumor cell subpopulations isolated from one spontaneous adenocarcinorna are heterogenous in terms of prostaglandin EL (PGEJ synthetic capacity. We have also shown that tumor-PGE2 contributes to the ability of these cells to grow and metastasize in vivo (Fulton and Heppner: Cancer Research 45:4779-4784, 1985). In the present study, we have asked whether exogenous PGEL has direct effects on the proliferation of these cells in vitro and if such responses can be attributed to the capacity of these cells to 1 ) bind PGE2 and 2) activate adenylate cyclase via the PGEL receptor. We report that PGE2, at concentrations below 1 x M, does not affect the proliferation rate of these cells. This unresponsiveness is not due to the absence of receptors for PGE2. However, marked heterogeneity in receptor binding and function was detected in these closely related cell lines. Two metastatic lines (66 and 410.4) have high-affinity receptors for PGE2 (average Kd = 4.3 x 10-' MIL and 4.2 x lo-' M/L, respectively) and similar binding capacities (4.1 x l o 4 and 2.9 x 1 O4 binding sites, respectively). Two nonrnetastatic lines, 41 0 and 67, have receptors with lower affinity (Kd=8.3 x lo-' MIL and 1.6 x lo-' MIL, respectively) and binding capacities of 2.8 x 105/410 cell or 7.3 x 104/67 cell. A third nonmetastatic line (1 68) exhibits no specific binding. PGEL receptor stimulation leads to elevated intracellular CAMP in lines 66, 410, and 67. Line 410.4 cells appear to have a functional lesion in the PGEl receptor resulting in a failure to elevate CAMP in response to receptor occupancy. Adenylate cyclase can, however, be activated in these cells by cholera toxin, NaF, or forskolin. In comparison to the other cell lines, line 168 cells respond poorly to all CAMPstimulating agents. Thus, we have found that PGEL binding i s a heterogenous property for these cells, and, in addition, we have identified an apparent uncoupling of PGEL receptor to the adenylate cyclase system in one cell line.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Prostaglandin E2 receptor modulation aff
✍ Shao-Zeng Zhang; Amy M. Fulton πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1991 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 689 KB

We have shown previously that murine mammary adenocarcinoma cells both synthesize prostaglandin E, (PGE,) and have a high affinity receptor for this ligand. Modulation of either PGE synthesis or PGE receptor function changes the metastatic potential of these cells. Because of the importance of lami

Prostaglandin E2 stimulates glutamate re
✍ Sanzgiri, Rita P. ;Araque, Alfonso ;Haydon, Philip G. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 324 KB

Recent Ca 2Ψ‰ imaging studies in cell culture and in situ have shown that Ca 2Ψ‰ elevations in astrocytes stimulate glutamate release and increase neuronal Ca 2Ψ‰ levels, and that this astrocyte-neuron signaling can be stimulated by prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ). We investigated the electrophysiological c

Regulation of the mouse mammary tumor vi
✍ Franklyn F. Bolander JR. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 605 KB

The mouse mammary tumor virus enters mammary epithelial cells via a plasma membrane protein that binds to a viral envelope glycoprotein, gp52. In intact cells, this gp52 receptor can be phosphorylated by activators of protein kinase A and protein kinase C (PKC), but this modification does not occur

Prostaglandin E2 receptor EP1 transactiv
✍ Chang Han; George K. Michalopoulos; Tong Wu πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 543 KB

## Abstract Recent evidence indicates that cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are involved in hepatocarcinogenesis. This study was designed to evaluate the possible interaction between the COX‐2 and EGFR signaling pathways in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ce