✦ LIBER ✦

Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: A randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil

✍ Scribed by Jacquelyn K. Chyu; Howard T. Strassner

Book ID: 113984147
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1997
Tongue: English
Weight: 626 KB
Volume: 177
Category: Article
ISSN: 1097-6868
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70153-4

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Prepidil gel versus an extemporaneous pr

Prepidil gel versus an extemporaneous preparation of prostaglandin E2 for pre-induction cervical ripening

✍ L. Sanchez-Ramos; L Farah; AM Kaunitz; CD Adair; C Walker; GO Del Valle; P Fuqua 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 110 KB

Oral misoprostol versus intravaginal pro

Oral misoprostol versus intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized trial

✍ Joseph Browning; Robert B. Gherman 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 🌐 English ⚖ 117 KB

A randomized trial comparing prostagland

A randomized trial comparing prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert (Cervidil) to vaginal gel for cervical ripening before induction of labor

✍ Padma Veligati; Fredrik F. Broekhuizen; Russell S. Kirby; Margaret Malnory 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 278 KB

A prospective, randomized comparison of

A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening

✍ Anthony C. Sciscione; Helen McCullough; James S. Manley; Philip A. Shlossman; Ma 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 136 KB

Cervical ripening: Randomized comparison

Cervical ripening: Randomized comparison of intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel with prostaglandin E2 gel plus laminaria tents

✍ Mureena A. Turnquest; Merit D. Lemke; Haywood L. Brown 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 39 KB

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adding laminaria tents to sequential intravaginal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel for cervical ripening. A prospective, randomized study was conducted from October 1994 to May 1995. Pregnant women with maternal or fetal indications for induction

?Misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 gel

?Misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening

✍ B. Taylor; J. Anderson; B. Stettler; N. Wetwiska; T. Howard 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB