Prone positioning for head and neck reconstructive surgery
β Scribed by Steven Ross Mobley; Brian Thomas Miller; Frank C. Astor; Bradley Fine; N. James Halliday
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 157 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1043-3074
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Certain head and neck surgical cases require the patient to be positioned prone. Such positioning carries with it an attendant subset of risks and complications not otherwise encountered in more traditional supine positioning. Gaining awareness of these risks and complications, and developing proactive positioning strategies, will enable the surgical team to position the patient optimally for the procedure and provide for every consideration of patient safety.
This article consists of a specific literature review of those issues directly related to the anatomical and physiological concerns arising from prone positioning. Particular attention is paid to the cardiopulmonary, renal, ophthalmologic, and neurological vulnerabilities unique to this position.
Proper planning by the surgical team and utilization of the correct equipment are a necessity. A tailored approach to the needs of the individual patient and an intimate awareness of the potential pitfalls will contribute to better outcomes when using the prone position. Β© 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2007
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract __Background.__ The use of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle in the repair of soft tissue defects arising after surgery for neoplasms of the head and neck has been a subject of controversy. We describe a variant of the SCM muscle flap called the βSCM myofascial flapβ and report our e
## Abstract ## Background. Freeβtissue transfer has become the preferred method of head and neck reconstruction but is a technique that is considered to use excessive hospital resources. ## Methods. This study is a retrospective review of 125 consecutive free flaps in 117 patients over a 16βmont
## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: To evaluate the patterns of failure, survival, and functional outcomes for patients treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and compare these results with those from a cohort of patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). ## Study Design: Pr