Projective Representations and Relative Semisimplicity
✍ Scribed by E Aljadeff; U Onn; Y Ginosar
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 175 KB
- Volume
- 217
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-8693
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Let R be a local commutative ring and let p be a prime not invertible in R. Let G be a finite group of order divisible by p. It is well known that the group ring Ž . RG admits nonprojective lattices e.g., R itself with the trivial action . For any 2 Ž . ␣ element ␣ g H G, R* one can form the twisted group ring R G. The ''twisting problem'' asks whether there exists a class ␣ s.t. the corresponding twisted group ring admits only projective lattices. For fields of characteristic p, the answer is in w Ž . x E. Aljadeff and D. J. S. Robinson J. Pure Appl. Algebra 94 1994 , 1᎐15 . Here we answer this question for rings of the form ޚ s, s G 2. The main tools are the p classification of modular representation of the Klein 4 group over ޚ and a 2 w Ž . Chouinard-like theorem E. Aljadeff and Y. Ginosar, J. Algebra 179 1996 , x 599᎐606 for twisted group rings.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We show that two surjective \*-adic Galois representations which are \*-adically close near the supersingular primes are equivalent up to a twist and a standard automorphism of GL n . In particular, two elliptic curves over a number field which are locally twist of each other in fact differ by a glo