𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Projections of Polynomial Vector Fields and the Poincaré Sphere

✍ Scribed by Helmut Röhrl; Sebastian Walcher

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
346 KB
Volume
139
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-0396

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Commutant Algebra and Harmonic Polynomia
Commutant Algebra and Harmonic Polynomials of the Lie Algebra of Vector Fields
✍ Kyo Nishiyama 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 199 KB

We determine the commutant algebra of W in the m-fold tensor product of its n natural representation in the case m F n. For m ) n, we show that the commutant algebra is of finite dimension by introducing a new kind of harmonic polynomial.

Lower Bounds for the Energy of Unit Vect
Lower Bounds for the Energy of Unit Vector Fields and Applications
✍ Etienne Sandier 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 460 KB

We prove lower bounds for the Dirichlet energy of a unit vector field defined in a perforated domain of R 2 with nonzero degree on the outer boundary in terms of the total diameter of the holes. We use this to derive lower bounds, and then compactness results for sequences (u = ) of minimizers or al

Magnetic susceptibility: Further insight
Magnetic susceptibility: Further insights into macroscopic and microscopic fields and the sphere of Lorentz
✍ Durrant, C.J. ;Hertzberg, M.P. ;Kuchel, P.W. 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 287 KB

## Abstract To make certain quantitative interpretations of spectra from NMR experiments carried out on heterogeneous samples, such as cells and tissues, we must be able to estimate the magnetic and electric fields experienced by the resonant nuclei of atoms in the sample. Here, we analyze the rela

Lower Bounds for the Energy of Unit Vect
Lower Bounds for the Energy of Unit Vector Fields and Applications: Volume 152, Number 2 (1998), pages 379–403
✍ Etienne Sandier 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 29 KB

A mistake in the proof of Theorem 1 occurred which was pointed out to the author by Tristan RivieÁ re. It is stated there that the constant C depends only on the domain and the H 1Â2 norm of the boundary data. It really should be the H s -norm for some s>1Â2 for the result to be correct. The proble