Progression in sulfur isotopic compositions from coal to fly ash: Examples from single-source combustion in Indiana
✍ Scribed by Yaofa Jiang; Erika R. Elswick; Maria Mastalerz
- Book ID
- 104013156
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 522 KB
- Volume
- 73
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0166-5162
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Sulfur occurs in multiple mineral forms in coals, and its fate in coal combustion is still not well understood. The sulfur isotopic composition of coal from two coal mines in Indiana and fly ash from two power plants that use these coals were studied using geological and geochemical methods. The two coal beds are Middle Pennsylvanian in age; one seam is the low-sulfur (b 1%) Danville Coal Member of the Dugger Formation and the other is the high-sulfur (N 5%) Springfield Coal Member of the Petersburg Formation. Both seams have ash contents of approximately 11%. Fly-ash samples were collected at various points in the ashcollection system in the two plants. The results show notable difference in δ 34 S for sulfur species within and between the lowsulfur and high-sulfur coal. The δ 34 S values for all sulfur species are exclusively positive in the low-sulfur Danville coal, whereas the δ 34 S values for sulfate, pyritic, and organic sulfur are both positive and negative in the high-sulfur Springfield coal. Each coal exhibits a distinct pattern of stratigraphic variation in sulfur isotopic composition. Overall, the δ 34 S for sulfur species values increase up the section in the low-sulfur Danville coal, whereas they show a decrease up the vertical section in the high-sulfur Springfield coal. Based on the evolution of δ 34 S for sulfur species, it is suggested that there was influence of seawater on peat swamp, with two marine incursions occurring during peat accumulation of the high-sulfur Springfield coal. Therefore, bacterial sulfate reduction played a key role in converting sulfate into hydrogen sulfide, sulfide minerals, and elemental sulfur. The differences in δ 34 S between sulfate sulfur and pyritic sulfur is very small between individual benches of both coals, implying that some oxidation occurred during deposition or postdeposition.
The δ 34 S values for fly ash from the high-sulfur Springfield coal (averaging 9.7‰) are greatly enriched in 34 S relative to those in the parent coal (averaging 2.2‰). This indicates a fractionation of sulfur isotopes during high-sulfur coal combustion. By contrast, the δ 34 S values for fly-ash samples from the low-sulfur Danville coal average 10.2‰, only slightly enriched in 34 S relative to those from the parent coal (average 7.5‰). The δ 34 S values for bulk S determined directly from the fly-ash samples show close correspondence with the δ 34 S values for SO 4 -2 leached from the fly ash in the low-sulfur coal, suggesting that the transition from pyrite to sulfate occurred via high-temperature oxidation during coal combustion.