𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Progress in Crystal Structure Prediction

✍ Scribed by Dr. John Kendrick; Dr. Frank J. J. Leusen; Dr. Marcus A. Neumann; Dr. Jacco van de Streek


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
722 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0947-6539

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The results of the application of a density functional theory method incorporating dispersive corrections in the 2010 crystal structure prediction blind test are reported. The method correctly predicted four out of the six experimental structures. Three of the four correct predictions were found to have the lowest lattice energy of any crystal structure for that molecule. The experimental crystal structures for all six compounds were found during the structure generation phase of the simulations, indicating that the tailor‐made force fields used for screening structures were valid and that the structure generation engine, which combines a Monte Carlo parallel tempering algorithm with an efficient lattice energy minimiser, was working effectively. For the three compounds for which the experimental crystal structures did not correspond to the lowest energy structures found, the method for calculating the lattice energy needs to be further refined or there may be other polymorphs that have not yet been found experimentally.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Crystal structure prediction for enilura
✍ Mark Sacchetti; Peter G. Varlashkin; Stacey T. Long; Robert W. Lancaster 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 244 KB

State-of-the-art molecular modeling tools were used to predict the crystal structure of eniluracil, a compound for which it has not been possible to grow a single crystal. Two methods were used, one that incorporates molecular structure and powder X-ray diffraction data and another that employs mole

Fast clustering of equivalent structures
✍ Van Eijck, Bouke P.; Kroon, Jan 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 147 KB 👁 2 views

Most methods of crystal structure prediction generate many trial structures. Because these may differ in choice of unit cell, it is not always immediately obvious whether or not two such structures are equivalent. A method to answer this question is described for the case where the asymmetric unit c