✦ LIBER ✦

Program tools for Apple are in PASCAL

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1982
Tongue: English
Weight: 137 KB
Volume: 6
Category: Article
ISSN: 0141-9331
DOI: 10.1016/0141-9331(82)90239-3

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

An environment for parallel programming

An environment for parallel programming in PASCAL

✍ Nelson Q. Vasconcelos; Edil S.T. Fernandes; Fernando M.B. Barbosa 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 491 KB

An Apple-II routine, written in Pascal f

An Apple-II routine, written in Pascal for bullet-proof numeric input

✍ P.F.A. van der Wiel 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 113 KB

Tools for distributed programming in the

Tools for distributed programming in the INCAS project

✍ Peter Buhler; Dicter Wybranietz 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 681 KB

How reliable are immunological tools for

How reliable are immunological tools for the detection of ancient proteins in fossil bones?

✍ Elisabeth Brandt; Ingrid Wiechmann; Gisela Grupe 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 111 KB

LORETO: a tool for reducing state explos

LORETO: a tool for reducing state explosion in verification of LOTOS programs

✍ Roberto Barbuti; Nicoletta De Francesco; Antonella Santone; Gigliola Vaglini 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 171 KB 👁 1 views

LOTOS is a formal specification language for concurrent and distributed systems. Basic LOTOS is the version of LOTOS without value-passing. A widely used approach to the verification of temporal properties is model checking. Often, in this approach the formal specification is translated into a label

Programming languages or generic softwar

Programming languages or generic software tools, for beginners' courses in computer literacy?

✍ Erich Neuwirth 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 460 KB

The question of the best method by which to teach computer literacy has been raised anew as a consequence of developing new curricula for this subject. We will therefore try to investigate arguments for the two main different approaches. The main danger when discussing this problem is putting too mu