Program evaluation/quality assurance: A waste of time?
โ Scribed by Ronald H. Nelson
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1979
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 168 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0090-4392
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The CLIA '88 regulations require the laboratory to review at least ## 10% of the gynecologic cases interpreted as negative that are examined by each cytotechnologist. The review must include negative cases selected at random and from patients identiJed as a high risk group. To evaluate the validity
Society expects to receive quality service and physicians are expected to provide quality care to patients. Over the past two decades, many terms have been used to describe how quality of care could be improved, including medical audits, quality assurance, quality improvement, continuing quality imp
Diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy in evaluating cervical/ vaginal smears were the focus of this study concerning intralaboratory quality control. A set of 120 cytological samples was evaluated by 15 cytopathologists whose experience ranged from 3-29 yr. The study report form was based on the 1
The complexity of large scale solid waste management projects, in this age of stringent fiscal and disposal space constraints, requires the application of a new broad-based management approach that takes full advantage of the benefits afforded by modern centralized facilities. To satisfy this need,