𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Astrid N. Scholten; Vincent T. H. B. M. Smit; Henk Beerman; Wim L. J. van Putten; Carien L. Creutzberg


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
264 KB
Volume
100
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

The most widely used histologic grading system for endometrial carcinoma is the three‐tiered International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) system. Although FIGO grading has significant predictive value, the reproducibility of Grade 2 is limited. Recently, a binary grading system was proposed based on the amount of solid growth, the pattern of myometrial invasion, and the presence of tumor cell necrosis. The authors analyzed and compared the prognostic significance and the interobserver variability of both grading systems and of the three criteria for the binary grading system.

METHODS

Eight hundred patients with Stage I–III endometrioid endometrial carcinoma were reviewed and graded independently by two pathologists according to the three‐tiered FIGO grading system and the novel binary grading system.

RESULTS

The interobserver agreement for both systems was moderate, with 70% and 73% agreement rates for the FIGO (κ = 0.41) and binary (κ = 0.39) grading systems, respectively. When converting the FIGO grading system into an artificial, 2‐tiered grading system (Grade 3 vs. Grades 1–2), the agreement was much better (agreement rate, 85%; κ = 0.58). Of the 3 criteria for the binary grading system, amount of solid growth (≤ 50% vs. > 50%) had the greatest reproducibility (agreement rate, 80%; κ = 0.50). Both the 2‐tiered FIGO grading system and the binary grading system were significant predictors of local recurrence, distant recurrence, and disease‐specific survival (hazard ratios [HRs]: 1.7, 2.5, and 2.6, respectively, for FIGO and 2.1, 4.1, and 3.8, respectively, for the binary grading system). The amount of solid growth also was a strong prognostic factor for these three endpoints (HRs: 2.4, 3.9, and 3.8, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the binary grading system and the FIGO grading system had strong prognostic significance. Their reproducibility, however, was limited. A simple architectural binary grading system that divided tumors into low‐grade lesions and high‐grade lesions based on the proportion of solid growth (≤ 50% or > 50%) had superior prognostic power and greater reproducibility. Cancer 2004;100:764–72. © 2004 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Prognostic significance of histologic gr
✍ Lars A. Akslen; Virginia A. LiVolsi 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 88 KB 👁 2 views

## Background: Papillary thyroid carcinomas represent a diversity of morphologic subtypes and variants, but to the authors' knowledge the prognostic significance of subclassification is not clear. therefore, the authors compared the value of histologic classification with a combined assessment of h

Nuclear DNA content and pathology in rad
✍ Massimo Rugge; Fulvia Sonego; Fausto Sessa; Gioacchino Leandro; Carlo Capella; C 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 798 KB

## BACKGROUND. Nuclear DNA content and pathology are considered to be prognostically relevant in several solid tumors, but controversial findings have emerged in pancreatic carcinoma (PC). Histopathology and DNA ploidy were each correlated with survival in radically treated PC to ascertain the hie