Prognostic factors in the management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression
β Scribed by Simon G. Tang; John E. Byfield; Thomas R. Sharp; Joella F. Utley; Llura Quinol; Stephen L. Seagren
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 469 KB
- Volume
- 1
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0167-594X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The results of 51 patients with metastatic spinal cord compression were analyzed. There were seven paralyzed patients, three received radiotherapy (RT) alone and four received laminectomy (L) + RT. No patient regained any motor function. Of six ambulatory patients, half received RT and half L + RT. All remained ambulatory after the treatment. Of 38 paraparetic patients, 20 underwent L + RT. Their complete, partial and nonresponse (CR, PR, NR respectively) rates were 25%, 60% and 15%, respectively. This result was clearly better than 18 other patients treated by RT alone of which only 22% regained ambulation (CR = 22%) while 67% were NR and 11% had a PR. In this series combined modality therapy appears better in paraparetic patients.
Five patients with radiosensitive tumors all had CR/PR whether treated by RT or L + RT. Patients with epithelial tumors treated by L + RT had a PR (CR + PR) of 71% while RT alone gave only 25%. On the basis of this analysis we conclude: (I) ambulatory patients respond satisfactorily to RT alone; (2) paraparetic patients with radiosensitive tumors do well with RT alone while such patients with epithelial tumors merit L + RT; but (3) paraplegic patients rarely benefit from either modality; (4) pain control appears a useful measure of minimally adequate radiation dose in individual patients. * P + Ml: pain plus mild motor dysfunction. Β§ P + M3: pain plus paraplegia. Β§ Β§ P + M2: pain plus paraparesis. Overall response (CR + PR) is 84% (L + RT) vs. 46% (RT alone). P ~ 0.05.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES