✦ LIBER ✦

Prognostic evaluation of oral tongue cancer: Means, markers and perspectives (II)

✍ Scribed by Ibrahim O. Bello; Ylermi Soini; Tuula Salo

Book ID: 113833381
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Weight: 422 KB
Volume: 46
Category: Article
ISSN: 1368-8375
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.06.008

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Prognostic evaluation of oral tongue can

Prognostic evaluation of oral tongue cancer: Means, markers and perspectives (I)

✍ Ibrahim O. Bello; Ylermi Soini; Tuula Salo 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 540 KB

Oncoapoptotic Markers in Oral Cancer: Pr

Oncoapoptotic Markers in Oral Cancer: Prognostics and Therapeutic Perspective

✍ Jain, Anubhav; Bundela, Saurabh; Tiwari, Ram P.; Bisen, Prakash S. 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 518 KB

The prognostic value of hypoxia markers

The prognostic value of hypoxia markers in T2-staged oral tongue cancer

✍ Jong-Lyel Roh; Kyung-Ja Cho; Gui Young Kwon; Chang Hwan Ryu; Hyo Won Chang; Seun 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 325 KB

O154. Identification and validation of d

O154. Identification and validation of diagnostic/prognostic markers for tongue cancer

✍ Suresh, A.; Vannan, M.; Dhanya, K.; Elango, E.M.; Thangaraj, K.; Kuriakose, M.A. 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 39 KB

Prognostic significance of proliferative

Prognostic significance of proliferative and apoptotic markers in oral tongue squamous cell carcinomas

✍ Xin Xie; P. De Angelis; O.P.F. Clausen; M. Boysen 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 155 KB

Treatment of stage I and II oral tongue

Treatment of stage I and II oral tongue cancer

✍ Dr. Daniel D. Lydiatt; Dr. K. Thomas Robbins; Dr. Robert M. Byers; Dr. Patricia 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 450 KB

We reviewed 156 previously untreated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue staged T1 and T2 to determine the incidence of nodal metastasis, and if elective neck dissection affected locallregional control or survival. Patients were divided into two nonrandomized groups: group 1, in