✦ LIBER ✦

Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments from Ignorance

✍ Scribed by Douglas Walton

Book ID: 110253993
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 1999
Tongue: English
Weight: 53 KB
Volume: 13
Category: Article
ISSN: 0920-427X
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007738812877

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Evaluating arguments from the reaction o

Evaluating arguments from the reaction of the audience

✍ Mercier, Hugo; Strickland, Brent 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 171 KB

A method for the computational modelling

A method for the computational modelling of dialectical argument with dialogue games

✍ T. J. M. Bench-Capon; T. Geldard; P.H. Leng 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 93 KB

Argumentative Ordering of Utterances for

Argumentative Ordering of Utterances for Language Generation in Multi-party Human–Computer Dialogue

✍ Vladimir Popescu; Jean Caelen 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 437 KB

Experimental evaluation of dialogue type

Experimental evaluation of dialogue types for data entry

✍ Kerstin Severinson Eklundh; Hans Marmolin; Carl-Eric Hedin 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 526 KB

An experiment evaluating four basic types of data entry dialogue with regard to speed showed a clear interaction between type of dialogue and type of data. A form-based dialogue was fastest for many ordered data, while a command dialogue was faster for unordered data. There was no significant differ

Evaluation of technology: some arguments

Evaluation of technology: some arguments for a qualitative approach

✍ Ron Levy 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 715 KB

A methodology for diagnostic evaluation

A methodology for diagnostic evaluation of spoken human — machine dialogue

✍ LAILA DYBKJÆR; NIELS OLE BERNSEN; HANS DYBKJÆR 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 283 KB

Diagnostic evaluation is an important instrument for the development of high-quality spoken language dialogue systems. Yet no rigorous methodology exists for the systematic and exhaustive diagnostic evaluation of all aspects of spoken language interaction: recognition, synthesis, grammar, vocabulary