Product compositions in rapid hydropyrolysis of coal
β Scribed by Eric M. Suuberg; William A. Peters; Jack B. Howard
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1980
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 951 KB
- Volume
- 59
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0016-2361
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The rapid hydropyrolysis of a Montana lignite and a Pittsburgh Seam bituminous coal has been examined at a high heating rate (1000Β°C s-l). The results are interpreted in the light of those presented previously for pyrolysis of the two coals. A complex situation involving simultaneous chemical and mass transfer rate control is revealed, and it is apparent that the pyrolysis phase cannot be treated separately from the hydropyrolysis phase. Three key process variables, hydrogen pressure, temperature, and particle diameter, are seen to have major effects on the total yields of products. There appears to be an important tradeoff between high hydrogen pressures and high temperatures. Under the present conditions of almost zero vapour residence time at elevated temperatures, methane is the principal product of reaction between hydrogen and coal, and the yields of light aromatic liquids are small.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Eight kinds of non-caking steam coals were pyrolysed using fixed beds in hydrogen streams at atmospheric pressure and at 30 kg cme2 up to 773 K. Sequential changes were followed in various sulphur forms: pyritic and ferrous sulphide sulphur in the char, and hydrogen sulphide in the gas. The internal
Coal was pyrolysed in hydrogen in a powder-particle fluidized bed at atmospheric pressure. The coal powder was continuously fed into the bed, in which CoMo/Al,O, catalyst particles or silica sand particles were fluidized. The effect of silica sand on the secondary reactions of volatile matter was qu
The use of dispersed sulphided molybdenum and hydrous titanium oxide (HTO) catalysts enable tar yields in excess of 60% daf coal to be obtained for bituminous coals in fixed-bed hydropyrolysis using relatively mild conditions. However, it was found that a key difference between hydropyrolysis and ba