✦ LIBER ✦

PRM20 TRENDS IN UTILITY ELICITATION METHODS: DIRECT VERSUS INDIRECT METHODS

✍ Scribed by L.A. Prosser; E. Wittenberg

Book ID: 119309586
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 58 KB
Volume: 14
Category: Article
ISSN: 1098-3015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.02.828

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Assessing the utility of direct and indi

Assessing the utility of direct and indirect methods for estimating tropical tree age in the Western Ghats, India

✍ Cheryl D. Nath; Anaïs Boura; Dario De Franceschi; Raphaël Pélissier 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 728 KB

Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetri

Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes

✍ Denise Bijlenga; Gouke J. Bonsel; Erwin Birnie 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 257 KB

Objective: To compare direct and indirect willingness to pay (WTP) elicitation methods in terms of feasibility, reliability, and comparability. The application is obstetrics, where always both a mother's and a child's health are at stake. Methods: An open-ended contingent valuation method (CVM) as