✦ LIBER ✦

PRM101 A Think Aloud Study Comparing the Validity and Acceptability of Discrete Choice and Best Worst Scaling Methods

✍ Scribed by Whitty, J.A.; Walker, R.; Golenko, X.; Ratcliffe, J.

Book ID: 122179147
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2012
Tongue: English
Weight: 71 KB
Volume: 15
Category: Article
ISSN: 1098-3015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.1564

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Rationalising the ‘irrational’: a think

Rationalising the ‘irrational’: a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responses

✍ Mandy Ryan; Verity Watson; Vikki Entwistle 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 161 KB

## Abstract Stated preference methods assume respondents' preferences are consistent with utility theory, but many empirical studies report evidence of preferences that violate utility theory. This evidence is often derived from quantitative tests that occur naturally within, or are added to, state

Eliciting preferences for priority setti

Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments

✍ Severin, Franziska; Schmidtke, Jörg; Mühlbacher, Axel; Rogowski, Wolf H 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 382 KB