𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Prime Power Divisors of Multinomial and q-Multinomial Coefficients

✍ Scribed by Grigori Kolesnik


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
151 KB
Volume
89
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-314X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We prove that for any integer d multinomial coefficients satisfying some conditions are exactly divisible by p d for many large primes p. The obtained results are essentially the best possible. Also, we show that under some hypothesis q-multinomial coefficients are divisible by p d .

2001 Academic Press

Theorem A is a simple corollary of related results on divisibility of binomial coefficients and we improved it in [1]. Here we further improve it in Theorems 1 4.

Since the case k=2 was studied in [1], we assume that k>2.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Small Sample Exact Power of the Range fr
✍ Prof. B. M. Bennett; E. N. Holmes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 165 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The authors (1968) have previously given tables of the percentage points of the range ( = w ) of r samples from a multinomial distribution of r cells each with probability r-i, r=2(1)10. This paper presents the small sample power of to for r=2(1)6 under alternatives 61 to the null hypothesis Ho of a

Existence of (q, 7, 1) difference famili
✍ K. Chen; R. Wei; L. Zhu πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 134 KB

## Abstract The existence of a (__q,k__, 1) difference family in __GF__(__q__) has been completely solved for __k__ = 3,4,5,6. For __k__ = 7 only partial results have been given. In this article, we continue the investigation and use Weil's theorem on character sums to show that the necessary condi

Existence and Explicit Constructions of
✍ M. Morgenstern πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 691 KB

For any prime power \(q\), we give explicit constructions for many infinite linear families of \(q+1\) regular Ramanujan graphs. This partially solves a problem that was raised by A. Lubotzky, R. Phillips, and P. Sarnak. They gave the same results as here, but only for \(q\) being prime and not equa