✦ LIBER ✦

Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial

Book ID: 117298716
Publisher: The Lancet
Year: 2006
Tongue: English
Weight: 184 KB
Volume: 367
Category: Article
ISSN: 0140-6736
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68147-6

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Prognostic Implications of ST-Segment El

Prognostic Implications of ST-Segment Elevation Resolution in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary or Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

✍ Tullio Palmerini; Stefano De Servi; Alessandro Politi; Alessandro Martinoni; Giu 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 677 KB

Facilitated percutaneous coronary interv

Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Comparison of prehospital tirofiban versus fibrinolysis before direct PCI

✍ Martin Möckel; Wolfgang Bocksch; Sebastian Strohm; York Kühnle; Jörn Vollert; Lu 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 125 KB

Multicenter randomized trial of facilita

Multicenter randomized trial of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention with low-dose tenecteplase in patients with acute myocardial infarction: The Athens PCI trial

✍ John Kanakakis; John N. Nanas; Eleftheria P. Tsagalou; George D. Maroulidis; Sta 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 115 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract Objectives: To examine the safety and efficacy of low‐dose tenecteplase, administered before facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to restore Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 2 or 3 blood flow in the infarct related artery (IRA) in patients with ST eleva

Comparison of Outcomes and Safety of “Fa

Comparison of Outcomes and Safety of “Facilitated” Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

✍ Raymond G. McKay; Marcin R. Dada; Jeffrey F. Mather; Roger R. Mennet; Deborah J. 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 262 KB

Intracoronary versus intravenous bolus a

Intracoronary versus intravenous bolus abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomised trial

✍ Holger Thiele; Jochen Wöhrle; Rainer Hambrecht; Harald Rittger; Ralf Birkemeyer; 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 The Lancet 🌐 English ⚖ 325 KB

ST segment resolution in patients with t

ST segment resolution in patients with tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus tenecteplase alone: Insights from the Combined Angioplasty and Pharmacological Intervention versus Thrombolysis ALone in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPITAL AMI) trial

✍ Derek Y.F. So; Andrew C.T. Ha; Richard F. Davies; Michael Froeschl; George A. We 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Pulsus Group Inc 🌐 English ⚖ 730 KB