๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Primary treatment choices for men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma detected by screening

โœ Scribed by Yan Yan; Gustavo F. Carvalhal; William J. Catalona; James D. Young


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
89 KB
Volume
88
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Background:

Increasingly, prostate carcinoma is diagnosed through screening. however, little is known regarding factors that influence a patient's decision concerning the treatment choices presented to him.

Methods:

Subjects were prostate carcinoma patients detected through the washington university psa prostate cancer screening program between september 1989 and june 1998. the sources of data were the prostate specific antigen (psa) screening database and follow-up questionnaire.

Results:

Among 1809 study subjects, 79.2% chose radical prostatectomy (rp), 12.4% chose radiation therapy, and 8.4% chose watchful waiting (ww) as their decision regarding primary treatment. in bivariate analyses, education, income, age, indication for prostate biopsy, comorbidity score, serum psa level, clinical stage, and pretreatment urinary and sexual function were associated significantly with treatment choice, but race, marital status, and gleason grade were not. in a multivariate analysis, age, race, clinical stage, psa level, and pretreatment urinary and sexual function were found to be associated significantly with treatment choice. for every 5-year decrease in age, the odds for choosing rp versus ww increased by 276%; for every 1-ng increase in psa, the odds for choosing rp versus ww increased by 12%. non-african-american patients were greater than four times more likely to select rp versus ww. patients with t2 tumors and those with normal pretreatment urinary function were three times more likely and twice more likely to choose rp versus ww, respectively.

Conclusions:

In the current study, rp was the most widely used treatment in patients with screen-detected prostate carcinoma. age, race, psa level, clinical stage, and pretreatment urinary and sexual function were significant factors influencing treatment selection.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Quality-of-life outcomes for men with pr
โœ Deborah S. Smith; Gustavo F. Carvalhal; Kay Schneider; Julie Krygiel; Yan Yan; W ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 98 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## BACKGROUND. There is limited information on outcomes of prostate carcinoma treatments given to screened patient populations for whom cancer is usually detected at an earlier stage. ## METHODS. The authors conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of quality-of-life outcomes for men with prostate

Factors associated with the use of flexi
โœ Gregory S. Cooper; Richard H. Fortinsky; Ronald Hapke; C. Seth Landefeld ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 75 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Background: Despite current recommendations of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening test for the detection of colorectal carcinoma, relatively few asymptomatic patients undergo this procedure. to enhance the use of sigmoidoscopy, differences in the use of screening, as well as barriers to scree