𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Primary care provider perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in a managed care setting

✍ Scribed by Gareth S. Dulai; Melissa M. Farmer; Patricia A. Ganz; Coen A. Bernaards; Karen Qi; Allen J. Dietrich; Roshan Bastani; Michael J. Belman; Katherine L. Kahn


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
104 KB
Volume
100
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests (e.g., fecal occult blood testing [FOBT], flexible sigmoidoscopy [FS], etc.) are underused. Primary care providers (PCPs) play a critical role in screening, but barriers to and facilitators of screening as perceived by PCPs in managed care settings are poorly understood. The objectives of the current study were to describe current CRC screening practices and to explore determinants of test use by PCPs in a managed care setting.

METHODS

In 2000, a self‐administered survey was mailed to a stratified, random sample of 1340 PCPs in a large, network model health maintenance organization in California.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 67%. PCPs indicated that 79% of their standard‐risk patients were screened for CRC. PCP‐reported median rates of recommendation for the use of specific screening tests were 90% for FOBT and 70% for FS. In logistic regression models, perceived barriers to the use of FOBT and FS included patient characteristics (e.g., education) and PCP‐related barriers (e.g., failure to recall that patients were due for testing). Perceived facilitators of the use of FOBT and FS included interventions targeting certain aspects of the health care system (e.g., reimbursement) and interventions targeting certain aspects of the tests themselves (e.g., provision of evidence of a test's effectiveness). Assignment of high priority to screening, integrated medical group (as opposed to independent practice association) affiliation, and the proportion of patients receiving routine health maintenance examinations were positively associated with reported test use.

CONCLUSIONS

CRC screening tests appear to be underused in the managed care setting examined in the current study. The perceived barriers and facilitators that were identified can be used to guide interventions aimed at increasing recommendations for, as well as actual performance of, CRC screening. Cancer 2004. Β© 2004 American Cancer Society.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Predictors of colorectal cancer screenin
✍ Melissa M. Farmer; Roshan Bastani; Lorna Kwan; Michael Belman; Patricia A. Ganz πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 109 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Despite the growing recognition of the importance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in reducing cancer mortality, national screening rates are low, indicating a critical need to understand the barriers and remedies for underutilization of CRC screening tests. ## METHO

Colorectal carcinoma screening attitudes
✍ Gregory S. Cooper; Zhong Yuan; Laura Veri; Alfred A. Rimm; Kurt C. Stange πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 73 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Background: To the authors' knowledge, physician attitudes and reported practices regarding colorectal carcinoma screening have not been studied in areas of highest risk for cancer death. ## Methods: Medicare claims were used to calculate colorectal carcinoma 2-year case-fatality rates for cou

Prevalence of and screening for serious
✍ Nicholas Henschke; Christopher G. Maher; Kathryn M. Refshauge; Robert D. Herbert πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 230 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective To determine the prevalence of serious pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain, and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recommended β€œred flag” screening questions. ## Methods An inception cohort of 1,172 consecutive patients