✦ LIBER ✦

Pricing and Underwriting Risk in Automobile Insurance: A Probabilistic View: Comment

✍ Scribed by Bob A. Hedges

Book ID: 123724561
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1975
Tongue: English
Weight: 204 KB
Volume: 42
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-4367
DOI: 10.2307/252161

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Pricing and Underwriting Risk in Automob

Pricing and Underwriting Risk in Automobile Insurance: A Probabilistic View: Author's Reply

✍ Robert Charles Witt 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 362 KB

More Evidence on the Systematic Underwri

More Evidence on the Systematic Underwriting Risk in Automobile Insurance

✍ J. François Outreville and Carole Helie 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 252 KB

Implications for unisex statutes and ris

Implications for unisex statutes and risk-pooling: The costs of gender and underwriting attributes in the automobile insurance market

✍ Robert Puelz; Walter Kemmsies 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 924 KB

Testing for Evidence of Adverse Selectio

Testing for Evidence of Adverse Selection in the Automobile Insurance Market: A Comment

✍ Georges Dionne, Christian Gouriéroux, and Charles Vanasse 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 University of Chicago Press 🌐 English ⚖ 178 KB

Clustering technique for risk classifica

Clustering technique for risk classification and prediction of claim costs in the automobile insurance industry

✍ Ai Cheo Yeo; Kate A. Smith; Robert J. Willis; Malcolm Brooks 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 196 KB

Clustering technique for risk classifica

Clustering technique for risk classification and prediction of claim costs in the automobile insurance industry

✍ Ai Cheo Yeo; Kate A. Smith; Robert J. Willis; Malcolm Brooks 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 196 KB

## Abstract This paper considers the problem of predicting claim costs in the automobile insurance industry. The first stage involves classifying policy holders according to their perceived risk, followed by modelling the claim costs within each risk group. Two methods are compared for the risk cla