We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to compare the efficacy of sclerotherapy plus propranolol with that of propranolol alone in the prevention of recurrent gastroesophageal bleeding in severely cirrhotic patients. For 2 yr (1987 to 1988) 131 patients (96% of whom were alcoholic
Prevention of recurrent bleeding in cirrhotics with recent variceal hemorrhage: Prospective, randomized comparison of propranolol and sclerotherapy
✍ Scribed by Wolfgang E. Fleig; Eduard F. Stange; Roland Hunecke; Wolfgang Schönborn; Ulrike Hurler; Kordula Rainer; Wilhelm Gaus; Hans Ditschuneit
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 796 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-9139
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
To compare the efficacy of endoscopic paravaricenl sclerotherapy and oral propranolol in the prevention of recrvrent upper gastrointeetinal bleeding, 78 cirrhotic patients were randomly assigned to either treatment after endoecopically proven bleed from emphageal varices. After randomieation, but before treatment had been started, a total of eight patients had to be withdrawn from the study due to early rebleeding (requiring emergency sclerotherapy) or violations of the protocol. Among the 70 patients analyzed (36 sclerothemapy, 34 propranolol), both treatment groups were comparable with reepect to demographic, clinical and laboratory data. The groups also did not differ with respect to continued alcohol intake. Sclerotherapy was performed twice weekly using 1% polidocanol as the scleroeing agent until the varices were eradicated or well-covered by fibrous tissue. Propranolol was given twice daily at a dame reducing the rerrting heart rate by 26% (80 to 320 mg per day; mean f SD = 161 f 80 mg per day). Patients were followed for up to 2 years with visits at 3 monthly intervals (mean follow-up = sclerotherapy, 14 monthe; propranolol, 9.2 months). Life table analysis of patients without rebleeding from nonvariceal sites revealed a tendemcy in favor of propranolol; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance. No significant difference was observed between sclerotherapy and proprrrndol in the proportion of patients rebleeding from e a m p b g d varices or from all sources of upper gaitrointertiarrl bledhg. Furthermore, survival was similar in both trerrtaaent groups. A small esophageal perforation due to ~~letrotbrapy was observed in one patient, and one ~~a p n n o l o l patient had to diecontinue the m d c atian due t o severe bradycardia. Other complications of s c l e r o t h e ~~y and side effecte of propranolol were minor. Prupranolol reduced variceal size significantly within 3 months of treatment. No such deereglle was obaerved in a mbgroup of patients who rebled under propranolol, and in the untreated control group of an ongoing trial of prophylactic sclerotherapy. W e conclude that propranolol and sclerotherapy are of compa-
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A prospective randomized trial was conducted in unselected, consecutive patients with bleeding esophageal varices resulting from cirrhosis comparing (1) emergency portacaval shunt performed within 8 hr of initial contact (21 patients) with (2) emergency medical therapy (intravenous vasopressin and e
trials have shown that somatostatin (SMT) is as effective as sclerotherapy in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding and that the combination of both treatments is more effective than sclerotherapy alone. To assess whether the addition of sclerotherapy improves the efficacy of SMT alone, all patie
In a previous randomized trial, we demonstrated that propranolol prevented recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. We have undertaken the present study in a new group of patients to ascertain the factors associated with rebleeding. Among 232 patients with cirrhosis admitted f
We have previously reported the results of a controlled trial showing that continuous oral administration of propranolol reduced the risk of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis; only part of our patients had been followed for 1 year. This controlled trial was continued for