𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Pressurized hot water extraction of insecticides from process dust – Comparison with supercritical fluid extraction

✍ Scribed by Cecilia Sparr Eskilsson; Kari Hartonen; Lennart Mathiasson; Marja-Liisa Riekkola


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
527 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
1615-9306

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Pressurized hot liquid water and steam were used to investigate the possibilities of extracting insecticides (carbofuran, carbosulfan, and imidacloprid) from contaminated process dust remaining from seed‐pellet production. Extraction temperature was the most important parameter in influencing the extraction efficiency and rate of extraction, while varying the pressure had no profound effect. A clean‐up procedure of the water extracts using solid phase extraction (SPE) was found to be necessary prior to final analysis by high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Quantitative extraction (compared to a validated organic solvent extraction method) of imidacloprid was obtained at temperatures of 100–150°C within 30 min extraction time. Temperatures above 150°C were required to extract carbofuran efficiently. The most non‐polar analyte of the investigated compounds, carbosulfan, gave no detectable concentrations with pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE). One reason might be its low solubility in water, and when attempts are made to increase its solubility by increasing the temperature it may degrade to carbofuran. This can explain recovery values above 100% for carbofuran at higher temperatures. A comparison of the PHWE results and those obtained with supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) revealed that PHWE is advantageous for polar compounds, where the solubility of the analyte in water is high enough that lower temperatures can be used. For non‐polar compounds carbon dioxide based extraction is preferred unless the target analyte is highly thermostable.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of solid-phase extraction and
✍ Silvia R. Sargenti; Harold M. McNair 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 100 KB 👁 2 views

This work compares four different extraction techniques solid-phase Ž . Ž . extraction SPE , supercritical fluid extraction SFE , solid-phase extraction fol-Ž . lowed by supercritical fluid extraction SPErSFE , and liquid᎐liquid extraction Ž .x Ž . LLE for the extraction of 16 polycyclic aromatic h

Dibenzyl ether as a probe into the super
✍ Susan H. Townsend; Michael T. Klein 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 433 KB

Thermolysis of dibenzyl ether in water at 374,401 and 412°C resulted in rapid ether hydrolysis to benzyl alcohol, which in turn underwent significant secondary reactions to polymeric material. The primary hydrolysis pathway competed with a slower primary pathway to toluene and either benzaldehyde or