Preoperative estimation of the liver graft weight in adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation using maximal portal vein diameters

✍ Scribed by Frank Wang; Kuang-Tse Pan; Sung-Yu Chu; Kun-Ming Chan; Hong-Shiue Chou; Ting-Jung Wu; Wei-Chen Lee

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2011
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 299 KB
• Volume: 17
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1527-6465
• DOI: 10.1002/lt.22274

✦ Synopsis

An accurate preoperative estimate of the graft weight is vital to avoid small-for-size syndrome in the recipient and ensure donor safety after adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Here we describe a simple method for estimating the graft volume (GV) that uses the maximal right portal vein diameter (RPVD) and the maximal left portal vein diameter (LPVD). Between June 2004 and December 2009, 175 consecutive donors undergoing right hepatectomy for LDLT were retrospectively reviewed. The GV was determined with 3 estimation methods: (1) the radiological graft volume (RGV) estimated by computed tomography (CT) volumetry; (2) the computed tomography-calculated graft volume (CGV-CT), which was obtained by the multiplication of the standard liver volume (SLV) by the RGV percentage with respect to the total liver volume derived from CT; and (3) the portal vein diameter ratio-calculated graft volume (CGV-PVDR), which was obtained by the multiplication of the SLV by the portal vein diameter ratio [PVDR; ie, PVDR ¼ RPVD 2 /(RPVD 2 þ LPVD 2 )]. These values were compared to the actual graft weight (AGW), which was measured intraoperatively. The mean AGW was 633.63 6 107.51 g, whereas the mean RGV, CGV-CT, and CGV-PVDR values were 747.83 6 138.59, 698.21 6 94.81, and 685.20 6 90.88 cm 3 , respectively. All 3 estimation methods tended to overestimate the AGW (P < 0.001). The actual graft-to-recipient body weight ratio (GRWR) was 1.00% 6 0.19%, and the GRWRs calculated on the basis of the RGV, CGV-CT, and CGV-PVDR values were 1.19% 6 0.25%, 1.11% 6 0.22%, and 1.09% 6 0.21%, respectively. Overall, the CGV-PVDR values better correlated with the AGW and GRWR values according to Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and the Landis and Kock benchmark. In conclusion, the PVDR method is a simple estimation method that accurately predicts GVs and GRWRs in adult LDLT.