๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Prenatal tests: how are women deciding?

โœ Scribed by Susan Michie; Deana Smith; Theresa M. Marteau


Book ID
101235860
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
144 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
0197-3851

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Women offered prenatal tests should be given sufficient information to enable them to make an informed decision. We compared the decision-making of 261 women who underwent serum screening for Down syndrome with 63 who did not. A questionnaire completed at 16 weeks' gestation assessed systematic decision-making (the weighing up of pros and cons on the basis of information presented), knowledge, anxiety and demographic information. Those undergoing screening were older but, with age partialled out, they had more knowledge about the test and made decisions less systematically than those not screened.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Deciding How Long to Test Software
โœ Kevin McDaid; Simon P. Wilson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons โš– 311 KB
How well informed are women who undergo
โœ E. Grace Neustaedter; Jill Milne; Kathleen Shorten; Betty Weckman; Angela Tse; S ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 82 KB

## Abstract ## Aims Urodynamic studies (UDS) are complex, invasive and may be emotionally and physically distressing. Inadequate information may heighten distress. Prior to UDS, our patients receive written and verbal information, yet concerns remains that some women may not be adequately informed

HOW GOOD ARE OUR TESTS?
โœ B. Clifford Hendricks ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1947 ๐Ÿ› School Science and Mathematics Association ๐ŸŒ English โš– 203 KB